<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Mon, 28 May 2012 11:45:02 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>News</title><subtitle>News</subtitle><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/atom.xml"/><updated>2011-01-25T17:39:18Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Summary of Key Tax Changes for 2011</title><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2011/1/25/summary-of-key-tax-changes-for-2011.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2011/1/25/summary-of-key-tax-changes-for-2011.html"/><author><name>Webmaster</name></author><published>2011-01-25T17:35:00Z</published><updated>2011-01-25T17:35:00Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>Personal Income Taxes</strong></p>
<p><em>Payroll tax holiday in place.</em> Employees will pay only 4.2% (instead of  the usual 6.2%) OASDI (Social Security) tax on compensation received during 2011  up to $106,800 (the wage base for 2011). Similarly, for tax years beginning in  2011, self-employed persons will pay only 10.4% Social Security self-employment  taxes on self-employment income up to $106,800. In either case, the maximum  savings for 2011 will be $2,136 (2% of $106,800) per taxpayer. If both spouses  earn at least as much as the wage base, the maximum savings will be $4,272.</p>
<p><em>Stricter rules apply to energy saving home improvements.</em> You can claim  a tax credit for energy saving home improvements you make this year, but  stricter rules apply for 2011 than for 2010. You can only claim a 10% credit for  qualified energy property placed in service in 2011 up to a $500 lifetime limit  (with no more than $200 from windows and skylights). What's more, the credit you  claim for any year can't exceed $500 less the total of the credits you claimed  for all earlier tax years ending after Dec. 31, 2005. The amount you claim for  windows and skylights in a year can't exceed $200 less the total of the credits  you claimed for these items in all earlier tax years ending after Dec. 31, 2005.  The credit is equal to the sum of: (1) 10% of the amount you pay or incur for  qualified energy efficient improvements (such as insulation, exterior windows or  doors that meet certain energy efficient standards) installed during the year,  and (2) the amount of the residential energy property expenses you paid or  incurred during the year.</p>
<p>The credit for residential energy property expenses can't exceed: (A) $50 for  an advanced main circulating fan; (B) $150 for any qualified natural gas,  propane, or hot water boiler; and (C) $300 for any item of energy efficient  property (advanced types of energy saving equipment, such as electric heat  pumps, meeting specific energy efficient standards).</p>
<p><em>Partial annuitization of annuity contracts.</em> When you receive  non-retirement-plan annuity payments from an annuity contract, part of each  payment is a tax-free recovery of your basis (cost of the annuity contract for  tax purposes), and part is a taxable distribution of earnings. For amounts  received in tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010, taxpayers may partially  annuitize such an annuity (or endowment, or life insurance) contract. If you  receive an annuity for a period of 10 years or more, or over one or more lives,  under any portion of an annuity, endowment, or life insurance contract, then  that portion is treated as a separate contract for annuity taxation purposes.  The net effect is that the annuitized portion is treated as a separate contract,  and each annuity payment from that portion is partially a tax-free recovery of  basis and partially a taxable distribution of earnings. Absent this rule, the  payments might have been treated as coming out of income before recovery of any  basis. The portion of the contract that is not annuitized is also treated as a  separate contract and will continue to earn income on a tax-deferred basis.</p>
<p><em>Restricted definition of medicine for health plan reimbursements.</em> Beginning this year, the cost of over-the-counter medicines can't be reimbursed  with excludible income through a health flexible spending arrangement (FSA),  health reimbursement account (HRA), health savings account (HSA), or Archer MSA  (medical savings account), unless the medicine is prescribed by a doctor or is  insulin. This new rule applies to amounts paid after 2010. However, it does not  apply to amounts paid in 2011 for medicines or drugs bought before Jan. 1, 2011.  Also, for distributions after 2010, the additional tax on distributions from an  HSA that are not used for qualified medical expenses increases from 10% to 20%  of the disbursed amount, and the additional tax on distributions from an Archer  MSA that are not used for qualified medical expenses increases from 15% to 20%  of the disbursed amount.</p>
<p><strong>Retirement Plan Changes</strong></p>
<p><em>Small employers may establish &ldquo;simple cafeteria plans.&rdquo;</em> For years  beginning after Dec. 31, 2010, small employers (those having an average of 100  or fewer employees on business days during either of the two preceding years)  may provide employees with a &ldquo;simple cafeteria plan.&rdquo; An employer that uses this  type of plan gets a safe harbor from the nondiscrimination requirements for  cafeteria plans as well as from the nondiscrimination requirements for certain  types of qualified benefits offered under a cafeteria plan, including group term  life insurance, benefits under a self-insured medical expense reimbursement  plan, and benefits under a dependent care assistance program.</p>
<p><em>Election to treat January 2011 charitable distributions as made in 2010. </em>If you are age 70 1/2 or older, you can make tax-free distributions to a  charity from an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) of up to $100,000. This  applies for charitable IRA transfers made in tax years beginning before Jan. 1,  2012. In addition, if you make such a distribution in January of 2011, you can  treat it for income tax purposes as if it were made on Dec. 31, 2010. Thus, a  qualified charitable distribution made in January of 2011 may be treated as made  in your 2010 tax year and count against the $100,000 exclusion for 2010. It is  also may be used to satisfy your IRA required minimum distribution for 2010.</p>
<p><strong>Tax Changes for Businesses and Investors</strong></p>
<p><em>Electronic filing rules now in place.</em> Beginning Jan. 1, 2011,  employers must use electronic funds transfer (EFT) to make all federal tax  deposits (such as deposits of employment tax, excise tax, and corporate income  tax). Forms 8109 and 8109-B, Federal Tax Deposit Coupon, cannot be used after  Dec. 31, 2010.</p>
<p><em>Up-to-$1,000 credit for &ldquo;retained workers&rdquo; in 2011.</em> Employers may  claim a &ldquo;retention credit&rdquo; for retaining qualifying new employees (certain  formerly unemployed workers meeting specific requirements). The amount of the  credit is the lesser of $1,000 or 6.2% of wages you pay to the retained  qualified employee during a 52 consecutive week period. The qualified employee's  wages for such employment during the last 26 weeks must equal at least 80% of  wages for the first 26 weeks. The credit may be claimed for a retained worker  for the first tax year ending after Mar. 18, 2010, for which the retained worker  satisfies the 52 consecutive week requirement. However, the credit applies only  for qualifying employees hired after Feb. 3, 2010, and before Jan. 1, 2011.</p>
<p><em>New basis and character reporting rules.</em> Generally effective on Jan.  1, 2011, every broker required to file an information return reporting the gross  proceeds of a &ldquo;covered security&rdquo; such as corporate stock must include in the  return the customer's adjusted basis in the security and whether any gain or  loss with respect to the security is short-term or long-term. The reporting is  generally done on Form 1099-B, &ldquo;Proceeds from Broker and Barter Exchange  Transactions.&rdquo; A covered security includes all stock acquired beginning in 2011,  except stock in certain regulated investment companies (i.e, mutual funds) and  stock acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan (both of which  are covered securities if acquired beginning in 2012).</p>
<p><em>Corporate actions that affect stock basis must be reported.</em> Effective  Jan. 1, 2011, issuers of &ldquo;specified securities&rdquo; must file a return describing  any organizational action (e.g., stock split, merger, or acquisition) that  affects the basis of the specified security, the quantitative effect on the  basis of that specified security, and any other information required by IRS. The  issuer's return (and information to nominees or certificate holders) must be  filed within 45 days after the date of the organizational action or, if earlier,  by January 15th of the year following the calendar year during which the action  occurred. Nominees or certificate holders must (unless the IRS waives this  requirement) be given a written statement showing (1) the name, address, and  telephone number of the information contact of the person required to file the  return, (2) the information required to be included on the return for the  security, and (3) any other information required by the IRS. In general, a  specified security is any share of stock in an entity organized as, or treated  for federal tax purposes as, a foreign or domestic corporation.</p>
<p><em>Reporting requirement for payment card and third-party payment  transactions.</em> After 2010, banks generally must file an information return  with the IRS reporting the gross amount of credit and debit card payments a  merchant receives during the year, along with the merchant's name, address, and  TIN. Similar reporting is also required for third party network transactions  (e.g., those facilitating online sales).</p>
<p><em>Information reporting for real estate.</em> For payments made after Dec.  31, 2010, for information reporting purposes, a person receiving rental income  from real estate is treated as engaged in the trade or business of renting  property. As a result, recipients of rental income from real estate generally  are subject to the same information reporting requirements as taxpayers engaged  in a trade or business. In particular, rental income recipients making payments  of $600 or more during the tax year to a service provider (such as a plumber,  painter, or accountant) in the course of earning rental income must provide an  information return (typically Form 1099-MISC) to the IRS and to the service  provider.</p>
<p>The rental property expense payment reporting requirement doesn't apply to:  (1) an individual who receives rental income of not more than a minimal amount  (to be determined by the IRS); (2) any individual (including one who is an  active member of the uniformed services or an employee of the intelligence  community) if substantially all of his or her rental income is derived from  renting the individual's principal residence (main home) on a temporary basis;  or (3) any other individual for whom the information reporting requirement would  cause hardship (to be defined by the IRS).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Estate and Gift Tax Changes --- 2010 Tax Relief Act.</title><category term="Estate Planning"/><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2011/1/19/estate-and-gift-tax-changes-2010-tax-relief-act.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2011/1/19/estate-and-gift-tax-changes-2010-tax-relief-act.html"/><author><name>Webmaster</name></author><published>2011-01-19T22:40:38Z</published><updated>2011-01-19T22:40:38Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>By&nbsp;<a href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/peter-a-spadoni/">Peter A. Spadoni</a></p>
<p><span>Following is a discussion of the estate and gift tax changes in the recently enacted 2010 Tax Relief Act. Before the new law, there was no estate tax for 2010, but some beneficiaries could have faced higher taxes because there were less favorable income tax basis rules. Also, under the prior law, estate and other transfer taxes were scheduled to rise substantially for post-2010 transfers. </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Overview of the new law.</span></strong><span> The 2010 Tax Relief Act provides temporary relief. Among other changes, it reduces estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer (GST) taxes for 2011 and 2012. It preserves estate tax repeal for 2010, but in a roundabout way: estates wanting zero estate tax for 2010 must elect that option, along with the less favorable modified carryover basis rules that were set to apply for 2010. Otherwise, by default, the estate tax is revived for 2010, with a $5 million exemption, a top tax rate of 35%, and a step-up in basis. Also, for estates of decedents dying after December 31, 2010, a deceased spouse's unused exemption may be shifted to the surviving spouse. However, these generous rules are temporary&mdash;much harsher rules are slated to return after 2012. </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Lower rate and higher exemption for 2011 and 2012.</span></strong><span> For estates of individuals dying in 2009, the top estate tax rate was 45% and there was a $3.5 million exemption. The top rate was to rise to 55% for estates of individuals dying after 2010, and the exemption was to be $1 million. For 2011 and 2012, the 2010 Tax Relief Act reduces the top rate to 35%. It also increases the exemption to $5 million for 2011 with a further increase for inflation in 2012. But these changes are temporary. After 2012, the top rate will be 55%, and the exemption will be $1 million. </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Special tax saving choice for 2010.</span></strong><span> The 2010 Tax Relief Act allows estates of decedents who died in 2010 to choose between (1) estate tax (based on a $5 million exemption and 35% top rate) and a step-up in basis, or (2) no estate tax and modified carryover basis. Basis is the yardstick for measuring income tax gain or loss when an asset is sold. With a step-up in basis, pre-death gain is eliminated because the basis in the heir's hands is increased to the date of death value of the asset. On the other hand, with a modified carryover basis, an heir gets the decedent's original basis, plus certain increases, which can be substantial. Even so, if the decedent had a relatively low basis and significant assets, some pre-death gain may be taxed when the heir sells the property. These concerns factor into the special choice for 2010. The executor should make whichever choice would produce the lowest combined estate and income taxes for the estate and its beneficiaries. This would depend, among other factors, on the decedent's basis in the assets immediately before death and how soon the estate beneficiaries may sell the assets. </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Gift tax changes.</span></strong><span> Years ago, the gift tax and the estate tax were unified&mdash;they shared a single exemption and were subject to the same rates. This was not the case in recent years. For example, in 2010, the top gift tax rate was 35% and the exemption was $1 million. For gifts made after December 31, 2010, the gift tax and estate tax are reunified and an overall $5 million exemption applies. </span></p>
<p><strong><span>GST tax changes.</span></strong><span> The GST tax is an additional tax on gifts and bequests to grandchildren when their parents are still alive. The 2010 Tax Relief Act lowers GST taxes for 2011 and 2012 by increasing the exemption amount from $1 million to $5 million (as indexed after 2011) and reducing the rate from 55% to 35%. </span></p>
<p><strong><span>New portability feature.</span></strong><span> Under the 2010 Tax Relief Act, any exemption that remains unused as of the death of a spouse who dies after December 31, 2010 and before January 1, 2013 is generally available for use by the surviving spouse in addition to his or her own $5 million exemption for taxable transfers made during life or at death. Under prior law, the exemption of the first spouse to die would be lost if not used. This could happen where the spouse with resources below the exemption amount died before the richer spouse. One way to address that was to set up a trust for the poorer spouse. Now, the portability rule may make setting up a trust unnecessary in some cases. But there still may be other reasons to employ credit shelter trusts. For example, a credit shelter trust may protect appreciation occurring between the death of the first spouse and the death of the second spouse from being subject to estate tax. Such a trust also can protect against creditors. Plus, the transferred exemption may be lost if the surviving spouse remarries and is again widowed. </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Washington</span></strong><strong><span> State</span></strong><strong><span> Issues.&nbsp; </span></strong><span>Even though we have significant changes in the federal rules, Washington  State continues to tax estates over $2,000,000. As a result we are still required to use tax savings trusts in wills in order to capture the full $4,000,000 exclusion for married couples. Washington's community property rules and custom drafted "Community Property Agreements" continue to be helpful in obtaining a stepped up basis in all assets owned by a married couple on the first death, if proper documents are in place.</span></p>
<p><strong><span>Conclusion.</span></strong><span> The&nbsp;federal estate tax relief in the new law is substantial, but it&nbsp;may be&nbsp;temporary. Estate planning to reduce taxes remains an important consideration. Even if taxes are not a concern because an estate is below the exemption level, it is important to have a proper estate plan to ensure that the needs of intended beneficiaries are met. Please schedule an appointment with us to discuss how you and your family can make the best use of the new estate and gift tax rules.&nbsp;</span></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Even Superheroes Die… Your Estate Planning in 2009</title><category term="Estate Planning"/><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2009/2/25/even-superheroes-die-your-estate-planning-in-2009.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2009/2/25/even-superheroes-die-your-estate-planning-in-2009.html"/><author><name>Webmaster</name></author><published>2009-02-25T16:15:55Z</published><updated>2009-02-25T16:15:55Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<h3 style="font-size: 90%;">By Todd M. Kiesz</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 90%;">Unbelievable, nearly two years have passed since the death of Evel Knievel. Mortality struck another childhood Superhero. I hope his planning was in order.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 90%;">If you have not updated your estate planning in the past several years, consider doing so now.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 90%;">Reason 1: It is a good idea to review one&rsquo;s planning every three to five years, or sooner if your life situation changes.</span></p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>State Law Creates New Employment Leave Benefits</title><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/8/14/state-law-creates-new-employment-leave-benefits.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/8/14/state-law-creates-new-employment-leave-benefits.html"/><author><name>Webmaster</name></author><published>2008-08-14T18:58:00Z</published><updated>2008-08-14T18:58:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[by Stan Bastian<br /><br /> Employers in Washington are now required to provide to their employees two new and additional types of leaves of absence: leave for domestic violence/sexual assault and family military leave. These new rules were recently passed by the Washington State Legislature and they apply to all employers &ndash; regardless of the size of the business or the number of employees. Further, employees have the right to sue the employer for violations. This article summarizes these new rules.]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Legal Technicians</title><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/4/2/legal-technicians.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/4/2/legal-technicians.html"/><author><name>Webmaster</name></author><published>2008-04-02T18:43:00Z</published><updated>2008-04-02T18:43:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[By Stan Bastian<br /><br /> This month the focus of my article is a little different than in the past. Rather than writing about a new development in the area of employment law, which is the focus of my law practice, I have decided to discuss a developing issue that is important to the legal profession as a whole. The issue is the growing and unmet need for legal services for low income clients and whether that need can be partially met by allowing non-lawyers to offer limited legal services.]]></summary></entry><entry><title>A Conversation with Dean Earl Martin</title><category term="BAR"/><category term="Interviews"/><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/3/19/a-conversation-with-dean-earl-martin.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/3/19/a-conversation-with-dean-earl-martin.html"/><author><name>Webmaster</name></author><published>2008-03-19T23:18:00Z</published><updated>2008-03-19T23:18:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[This month I want to introduce you to Earl Martin, the Dean of the Gonzaga University School of Law in Spokane. Dean Martin arrived at Gonzaga in July 2005 after several years first with the U.S Air Force JAG Corps and then teaching at Texas Wesleyan University in Fort Worth Texas. He is a fourth generation lawyer from Kentucky, and was educated at the University of Kentucky and Yale Law School. I met him last year during a visit to the law school for a bar related function and was impressed with his dedication, enthusiasm and energy. It was clear to me, even after only a brief visit, that Dean Martin is committed to both his school and its students.]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Raising Money for Your Business</title><category term="Securities"/><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/3/17/raising-money-for-your-business.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/3/17/raising-money-for-your-business.html"/><author><name>Webmaster</name></author><published>2008-03-17T23:15:00Z</published><updated>2008-03-17T23:15:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[by J. Kevin Bromiley<br /><br /> Does your business need an infusion of capital to grow into what you envision it becoming? Do you have a business idea, but lack the resources to bring the concept into fruition? If so, you have probably considered borrowing money from a bank and/or seeking private investors. This article will discuss the latter option, known as selling securities. As securities is a complicated area of the law, this article will be an introduction to some issues of which you should be aware.]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Presidents Column</title><category term="Initiatives"/><category term="Presidents Column"/><id>http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/1/13/presidents-column.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.jdsalaw.com/news/2008/1/13/presidents-column.html"/><author><name>Webmaster</name></author><published>2008-01-13T00:05:00Z</published><updated>2008-01-13T00:05:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[At our meeting in October 2007, the WSBA Board of Governors voted to support an initiative to secure &lsquo;salary restoration&rsquo; for the federal judiciary. If successful, this initiative will result in an immediate and substantial increase in pay for federal judges, which they clearly need and deserve. However, the concept of salary restoration means more than just a pay raise. The intent is to restore judicial pay to levels where once again a judicial appointment can be considered to be the capstone to a distinguished legal career. It should not be used as a stepping stone to a lucrative position in private practice.]]></summary></entry></feed>
